Ripple Vs. SEC: 3 Scenarios What Could Be Next

The legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been a focal point for the crypto community, and the recent developments have only intensified the spotlight. The SEC’s request for an interlocutory appeal has stirred a whirlwind of analysis, with legal experts weighing in on the potential outcomes and their broader implications. Drawing from the insights of the lawyers James “MetaLawMan” Murphy, Bryan Jacoutot and Bill Morgan, let’s dissect the possible scenarios that could play out.

Scenario 1: Ripple Opposes the Interlocutory Appeal

MetaLawMan’s analysis suggests that Ripple’s first option is to oppose the motion to certify the appeal. The foundation of this stance is Ripple’s unwavering confidence in the correctness of Judge Torres’ decision. By opposing the appeal, Ripple would be signaling its belief that the decision aligns perfectly with the company’s legal stance, especially secondary market sales of XRP.

Murphy lays out three reasons why this could be the most likely scenario: First, Ripple does not want to agree with the premise that there is “substantial grounds for difference of opinion” on Judge Torres’ ruling which is part of the legal standard for certifying an interlocutory appeal.

Moreover, there’s a possibility, albeit slim, that a crypto law could be enacted by Congress. Such legislation might redefine the original institutional sales of XRP, characterizing them as non-securities transactions. This redefinition would hinge on the fact that institutional buyers didn’t receive equity or legal rights to participate in Ripple’s profits in exchange for their money.

Third, there might be a change in administration: Looking ahead to 2025, a new administration could bring a fresh perspective to the SEC’s approach to crypto enforcement actions. This could manifest as either an immediate dismissal of the case or a settlement on terms favorable to Ripple, according to Murphy.

Scenario 2: Ripple Agrees to the Interlocutory Appeal

MetaLawMan also raises the possibility of Ripple agreeing with the SEC that an interlocutory appeal could be appropriate. Such a move would be rooted in the acknowledgment of the inevitability of appeals in this case. The pivotal question then becomes one of timing: will the appeals process be initiated immediately, or will it be deferred until after the trial of Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen?

Scenario 2A: Ripple Seeks A Cross-Appeal

Adding a layer of complexity, Ripple could opt for a cross-appeal on the institutional sales claim while agreeing to the interlocutory appeal. The strategic logic here, as outlined by MetaLawMan, is that if the 2nd Circuit were to reverse the SEC’s win on this claim, it would eliminate the need for a trial on aiding and abetting the institutional sales.

Lawyer Bill Morgan also zeroes in on a pivotal aspect of Judge Torres’ decision concerning sales to On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) customers. He underscores the magnitude of this decision, noting that all Ripple sales post-June 2020 were to ODL customers, amounting to a staggering $3 billion post-complaint. Given the financial implications and the SEC’s intent to target this sum, Morgan firmly believes that Ripple must consider appealing this part of Judge Torres’ decision.

Scenario 3: One Step Further

Bryan Jacoutot, partner at Election Law Group, draws attention to the Terraform Labs case, which could significantly influence Judge Torres’ decision. Jacoutot points out that the SEC’s citation of the Terraform case is particularly noteworthy. In this case, the judge “rejected” part of Judge Torres’ analysis, specifically her distinction between institutional sales and “programmatic sales.” This rejection is not just a minor disagreement; it challenges the very foundation of Judge Torres’ ruling in the Ripple case.

Given this intra-district dispute between the XRP decision and the Terraform decision, Jacoutot believes that the current case is a prime candidate for an interlocutory appeal. If Judge Torres accedes to the SEC’s request, it would set the stage for the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals to weigh in on this pivotal matter.

Furthermore, Jacoutot emphasizes the potential streamlining of the appellate process if the interlocutory appeal is granted. This would mean a more expedited and definitive ruling on whether Torres’ novel “blind bid/ask” Howey theory stands up to scrutiny.

At press time, the XRP price remained in its sideways trend, trading at $0.6344.

JuiceStorm TV

Trading The UK, IE, US And AU Betfair Horse Racing Markets 24/7

The Betfair selections we are trading above are UK time. Only filled trades or bets appear on JuiceStorm TV.

Unsure how to get involved? Take a look here.

In 2021 TradeHost traded 7,937 Betfair UK, IE, US & AU horse racing and greyhound markets.

2022 saw TradeHost become even more profitable with 22,698 Betfair markets traded.

2023 less markets were traded – 17,459 – but a with a similar profit to 2022.

All trades and bets were streamed live on JuiceStorm TV which was was watched by 124,209 traders in 2022.

All results for the 48,094 Betfair markets traded are here and the charts are here.

Top 100 Comments on JuiceStorm.com

Racing Traders has over 20,000 registered members and more join every day. Find out why with a free trial.

BetTrader from RacingTraders.co.uk was the 1st application for Betfair & introduced the ladder UI. Invest £99 in yourself with a JuiceStorm EXCLUSIVE crypto only offer for a BetTrader lifetime license and no further payments.

Successful Betfair Traders have the simplest Betfair Trading systems. The difference is their selection process, experience and execution level. Get that difference for yourself with automated trading by TradeHost.

Our AI articles are NOT written by a real person and are provided for entertainment only. They may contain content which is inaccurate but we are hoping our AI bot, Rose, will become better over time. The AI category is the ONLY section of JuiceStorm.com that has zero human input.

Leave A Reply
Comment Rules

  • Please show respect to the opinions of others no matter how seemingly far-fetched.
  • Abusive, foul language, and/or divisive comments may be deleted without notice.
  • Each JuiceStorm member is allowed two daily comments. Use them wisely.
  • Comments must be limited to the number of words displayed above the comment box.
  • Use branded capitalisation, eg. JuiceStorm, TradeHost, BetTrader, etc or John will get upset.
  • You agree that any comment you make may be used for marketing purposes by JuiceStorm.com.
  • You need more than 20 words? Click here for the largest Telegram community for Betfair Traders.